
(09-12-2013, 02:17 AM)Aleister Wrote:(09-12-2013, 02:10 AM)DAISHI Wrote: Wait, now previous evidence is being asked to be submitted on an at whims basis. We only formerly made the claim that the egi evidence. If so then my character observes the ease of a Primals defeat on the basis of sight as well as word. Then every person I see with one would be evidence. Meaning that it is actually as easy as I would take it, GIVEN that this very thread has submitted the egi must be evidence. You cannot ask it to be evidence only when requested or role play will have no logical internal consistency.No-no.. I will not even bother with the egi gameplay thing unless the RPer who has it has stated its existence ICly.. Same goes for mini-pets as well. I believe gameplay stuff should stay out of RP unless brought into the RP session by the character but that is just me. RP addons would help on knowing if the RPer has a egi or a minion following them about like the ones in WoW but sadly we don't have those yet. (Though I will never accept ICly someone having a baby behemoth.. >_> cause I'm pretty sure.. give it a hour the momma is gonna come destroying a city, amirite?)
I don't have any opinion on the summoner/primal stuff (I see arguments both for and against using them in RP), but as for the minion pets, I like to think of all of them as windup clockworks. Many of them are already listed as windups. So that Baby Behemoth is actually just a toy.