Same as with the whole player casinos topic, I've made a thread in the forums asking for clarification.
The entire "violation on both sides" thing makes me think the GM is ESL and didn't understand the question because the two players weren't exchanging any in-game currency and assumed they made outside-of-game arrangements.
The entire "violation on both sides" thing makes me think the GM is ESL and didn't understand the question because the two players weren't exchanging any in-game currency and assumed they made outside-of-game arrangements.