Discussion of "Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide" - Printable Version +- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18) +-- Forum: Community (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Forum: RP Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=13) +--- Thread: Discussion of "Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide" (/showthread.php?tid=9400) |
RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Tiergan - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:39 PM)Aysun Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:35 PM)Kage Wrote: Obligatory thanks but back to my question. Wow - I had no idea Keeper males were nomadic and lived that sort of lifestyle. o_o THE MORE YOU KNOW o/ RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Aysun - 12-24-2014 OKAY yea I think I was misunderstanding. Wording things. Don't mind me. ![]() RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Gegenji - 12-24-2014 Maybe I'm misunderstanding things, but I think both sides could be construed as having a sort of polyamorousness to it. It's just whether it's one male having affection/sexual relations with multiple females (Seekers), or a female having the same with multiple males (Keepers). You could just as easily say it's a duty (You MUST mate with the Nunh vs. You MUST submit to a female's wishes) as well. It's just vague enough that you can really go either way with it and, as several folks have shown, this can extend to entire tribes as well. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Kage - 12-24-2014 I mean when I keep reading the statement "they lie with him and him alone" I can read it in a few certain ways. The main one I think of is "He's forcing them to be like in like a harem environment where the guy just wants a ton of females for sex". RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - ArmachiA - 12-24-2014 I assume it's polyamory because monogamy isn't a part of Keeper lifestyle (to the point where it's foreign to them) AND they exhibit love. So it stands to reason the Keepers (Males in particular) will love more than one person and everyone will be fine with that. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - D'aito Kuji - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:39 PM)Val Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:32 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:15 PM)Zetchryn Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:12 PM)ArmachiA Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:08 PM)Faye Wrote: (...) I do think Seeker lifestyle isn't quite polyamory--but I think Keeper lifestyle easily could be). I feel like it's not only a duty, some tendency for this may be built into their DNA. Not just any male Miqo'te can become a Nuhn, it's not just a political title.  He should represent the best breed and offer the best combination of physical and intellectual behaviors.  This makes the Nuhn the most reasonable person to breed with as it helps ensure the next generation carries those traits. This could also mean that while many Miqo'te females may have relationships with others, with outsiders, that when it comes to breeding she may look for qualities that may or may not be shared with her current romantic partner.  But I'm just speculating. But polyamory suggests a mutual love based relationship but I don't necessarily feel like that's what's going on when I visit the U-Tribe.  That all seems more like a business relationship.  For all I know, they draw straws for breeding or play lottery.  I have no idea.  But I don't think that romantic love plays all that much of a part. However, there is more than one kind of love.  Love of family, love of community, love for each other, and those might play a much larger role and could be a sort of foundation for polyamory but that's probably a stretch. This is all just my opinion and interpretation, of course. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Faye - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:23 PM)FreelanceWizard Wrote: All, At last! Thank you! ![]() RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Kage - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:51 PM)ArmachiA Wrote: I assume it's polyamory because monogamy isn't a part of Keeper lifestyle (to the point where it's foreign to them) AND they exhibit love. So it stands to reason the Keepers (Males in particular) will love more than one person and everyone will be fine with that.As I've stated I'm very much not familiar where that is, and I'm soooo sorry if this is de-railing Lili's thread but the point was made about races and stuff, where is monogamy not part of the Keeper lifestyle? I understand that there are just lots less male miqo'te (seeker and keeper) but I don't see why it's close to if then. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Steel Wolf - 12-24-2014 Okay question. Semi-related. It would seem that Keeper is the "grindy happy times" race that seems to be prevalent in most fantasy fiction (I'm lookin' at you, Twi'leks)...but there's no real elaboration on how the other races feel about the whole thing, if at all. I'll assume it's really up to player choice, but I wasn't entirely sure. I mean, would it be weird for an Elezen to have a polyamorous lifestyle? RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Kismet - 12-24-2014 Not sure how on or off-topic this is, but... Several of my friends and I have been under the impression that the mating rituals of Seekers aren't really commonplace in Eorzea anymore. The whole Nuhn/Tia thing was very widespread years ago when tribes were being traditional and whatnot, but now that it's the adventuring age, many Seekers have left that lifestyle behind. The U tribe in Forgotten Springs is considered an old-fashioned minority, if you will. None of this is to say that there are NO more traditional Seeker mating groups to be found. It's just not widespread or "the norm" anymore. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Zetchryn - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 03:01 PM)Steel Wolf Wrote: Okay question.  Semi-related. No weirder then a Hyun, or a Roe, methinks. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - McBeef™ - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 03:01 PM)Steel Wolf Wrote: Okay question. Semi-related. I don't it would be terribly weird. Lots of things point to the idea that Eorzea is /very/ sexually liberated. Possibly even more so then our own time. You only need to look at things like the lesbian bar in Limsa, or the fact that eternal bond isn't limited to race. I think most of the other races tend to have monogamous relationships, but there aren't no prudes in Eorzea it seems. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - D'aito Kuji - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:57 PM)Kage Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:51 PM)ArmachiA Wrote: I assume it's polyamory because monogamy isn't a part of Keeper lifestyle (to the point where it's foreign to them) AND they exhibit love. So it stands to reason the Keepers (Males in particular) will love more than one person and everyone will be fine with that.As I've stated I'm very much not familiar where that is, and I'm soooo sorry if this is de-railing Lili's thread but the point was made about races and stuff, where is monogamy not part of the Keeper lifestyle? I understand that there are just lots less male miqo'te (seeker and keeper) but I don't see why it's close to if then. I don't think it was in the lore until very very recently.  The dialogue Aysun posted a few posts back showed the offense and chagrin Mauh Lihzeh felt over some Keepers being held by King Poach: "most unnaturally they lie with him and him alone." To me, that suggests Keepers are very used to sharing and would likely resist monogamy.  Whereas Seekers are expected to be monogamous to the Nuhn (same-sex relationships notwithstanding in my particular tribe). RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Val - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 02:53 PM)Daitokuji Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:39 PM)Val Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:32 PM)Natalie Mcbeef Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:15 PM)Zetchryn Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:12 PM)ArmachiA Wrote: This is a really good point. I've never thought about it but Keeper's would seem to be more Polyamorous than Seekers. I agree entirely! Val has it ingrained in his system. He is deathly in love with Faye, but he occasionally has private moments where he fights with his natural instinct to procreate and his loyalty to stick with just Faye. I personally enjoy it and embrace it as character development. For most though, like you said, I think that it's a business relationship and that the Keepers are more love-oriented, and therefore more likely to practice polyamorous relationships. RE: Polyamory: A Roleplaying Guide - Kage - 12-24-2014 (12-24-2014, 03:07 PM)Daitokuji Wrote:I certainly see how it could be interpreted that way. But the first thing I thought when I read it wasn't "oh man keepers are polyamorous and this goes against"(12-24-2014, 02:57 PM)Kage Wrote:(12-24-2014, 02:51 PM)ArmachiA Wrote: I assume it's polyamory because monogamy isn't a part of Keeper lifestyle (to the point where it's foreign to them) AND they exhibit love. So it stands to reason the Keepers (Males in particular) will love more than one person and everyone will be fine with that.As I've stated I'm very much not familiar where that is, and I'm soooo sorry if this is de-railing Lili's thread but the point was made about races and stuff, where is monogamy not part of the Keeper lifestyle? I understand that there are just lots less male miqo'te (seeker and keeper) but I don't see why it's close to if then. It was like "wow he's forcing multiple women to be with him. He totally only needs one." I guess I'm struggling to see how the fact that they are much more into fulfilling and loving relationships means that they're more likely to be polyamory. Taking promiscuity into account because of the need for males to breed with the larger amount of females, what's in the lore that states that it's only familial and isn't for procreation purposes? |