Hydaelyn Role-Players
My take on the anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Printable Version

+- Hydaelyn Role-Players (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18)
+-- Forum: Community (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=8)
+--- Forum: RP Discussion (https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/mybb18/forumdisplay.php?fid=13)
+--- Thread: My take on the anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon (/showthread.php?tid=5085)

Pages: 1 2


My take on the anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - TheBlob - 10-15-2013

Removing as I have been educated! I believe much of my theory is too far evolved from where the timeline is now. Given a few decades things could turn towards this. This is why I enjoy RP communities!


Also.. sorry about the spoiler messups... stupid phones.
Show Content
Show Content

Show Content

Show Content



RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Nimarhie - 10-15-2013

Some of the things in the Sociology part I didn't know about, very interesting. Smile


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - LiadansWhisper - 10-15-2013

I'm curious...why communes?  Is that a word from the wiki that I missed, or something you came up with?  If the latter, why that word?  I dunno why, but it bugs me.  xD


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - TheBlob - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 08:27 PM)Nimarhie Wrote: Some of the things in the Sociology part I didn't know about, very interesting. Smile

Much, if not most of the sociology portion is just stuff I've pulled from thin air in an effort to build up a sense of self for the culture.

(10-15-2013, 08:35 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote: I'm curious...why communes?  Is that a word from the wiki that I missed, or something you came up with?  If the latter, why that word?  I dunno why, but it bugs me.  xD

Communes is just something I came up with. A play on community which is used in the wiki. 

I thought it fit the bill for tribe, but not a tribe.. community.. but a closed one?  Haha


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - LiadansWhisper - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 08:49 PM)ShayRei Wrote:
(10-15-2013, 08:35 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote: I'm curious...why communes?  Is that a word from the wiki that I missed, or something you came up with?  If the latter, why that word?  I dunno why, but it bugs me.  xD

Communes is just something I came up with. A play on community which is used in the wiki. 

I thought it fit the bill for tribe, but not a tribe.. community.. but a closed one?  Haha

Well, uh, because Communes is normally associated with Communism, and your society doesn't fit that at all, it was just confusing is all!

Thanks for the clarification!


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - TheBlob - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 09:07 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote:
(10-15-2013, 08:49 PM)ShayRei Wrote:
(10-15-2013, 08:35 PM)LiadansWhisper Wrote: I'm curious...why communes?  Is that a word from the wiki that I missed, or something you came up with?  If the latter, why that word?  I dunno why, but it bugs me.  xD

Communes is just something I came up with. A play on community which is used in the wiki. 

I thought it fit the bill for tribe, but not a tribe.. community.. but a closed one?  Haha

Well, uh, because Communes is normally associated with Communism, and your society doesn't fit that at all, it was just confusing is all!

Thanks for the clarification!

Interesting.. I've never associated communes with communism... Mostly hippies and naked people. >.>

Hah


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Nako Vesh - 10-15-2013

I like the ideas and creativity you have going here, and I was thinking we might have to have a player-made Keeper compendium sooner or later if SE didn't provide more lore. 

I do question a few points however. As brought up in this thread, we don't have a whole lot of real life matriarchal societies to draw upon when imagining the Keepers, but there are a few. I was personally quite taken with the idea that, like the Mosuo, Miqote might take mating/coupling/relationships in a far less formal tone than you have suggested here.

It makes sense to me that a society that highly values physicality in the form of hunting and sport, would put less emphasis on social status or class through other means. I personally see them as gaining status almost entirely through prowess in battle, while some reverence is based bloodlines. I personally don't see "class" playing a part much at all.

Quote:Each member within the community is expected to hold a skill-set vital to the success of the commune. While difficult, the climb can and has been made from the bottom of the social ranking toward the top and into a house of influence. 
I don't really think Keepers should veer into the area of family houses personally. I like the idea of small tribes better.


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Michikyou - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 09:24 PM)Nako Vesh Wrote: I like the ideas and creativity you have going here, and I was thinking we might have to have a player-made Keeper compendium sooner or later if SE didn't provide more lore. 

I do question a few points however. As brought up in this thread, we don't have a whole lot of real life matriarchal societies to draw upon when imagining the Keepers, but there are a few. I was personally quite taken with the idea that, like the Mosuo, Miqote might take mating/coupling/relationships in a far less formal tone than you have suggested here.

It makes sense to me that a society that highly values physicality in the form of hunting and sport, would put less emphasis on social status or class through other means. I personally see them as gaining status almost entirely through prowess in battle, while some reverence is based bloodlines. I personally don't see "class" playing a part much at all.

Quote:Each member within the community is expected to hold a skill-set vital to the success of the commune. While difficult, the climb can and has been made from the bottom of the social ranking toward the top and into a house of influence. 
I don't really think Keepers should veer into the area of family houses personally. I like the idea of small tribes better.

I thought they would be called small tribes made of 1-3 families.


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - allgivenover - 10-15-2013

Keepers do not pair up monogamously. They have breeding males ala the Seekers of the Sun. Unfortunately we have no details beyond that.

From a level 25 Quarry Mill levequest that states explicitly that Keepers have breeding males as well (I forget the name at the moment)

[Image: aCBXBRR.png]

Secondly, this topic needs a disclaimer that a lot of this is your invention, isn't canon, and relies on a large number of assumptions. We don't get to decide the lore or the direction that Keepers should take, SE does. Unfortunately SE only gave us scraps and scarce details that begged even more questions. In the case of Keepers, all we ever got regarding sexuality and mating was the description that they are matriarchal and that males are rare. Few conclusions can be drawn from so little canon info, Keepers being monogamous isn't one of them.

Consider this, Miqo'te males are born very rarely (there is ONE that we get to see in game), if they paired monogamously with females there wouldn't be enough males to pair with, and as a result the Keepers would have passed into obscurity long ago.

This topic has been poked at to death many times in the past, my favorite post on the subject can be found hereSadhttp://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/showthread.php?tid=2961). I'm not saying you have to accept it, but it does make reasonable conclusions regarding what a fantastical culture with these features would be like.


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - TheBlob - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 09:24 PM)Nako Vesh Wrote: I like the ideas and creativity you have going here, and I was thinking we might have to have a player-made Keeper compendium sooner or later if SE didn't provide more lore. 

I do question a few points however. As brought up in this thread, we don't have a whole lot of real life matriarchal societies to draw upon when imagining the Keepers, but there are a few. I was personally quite taken with the idea that, like the Mosuo, Miqote might take mating/coupling/relationships in a far less formal tone than you have suggested here.

It makes sense to me that a society that highly values physicality in the form of hunting and sport, would put less emphasis on social status or class through other means. I personally see them as gaining status almost entirely through prowess in battle, while some reverence is based bloodlines. I personally don't see "class" playing a part much at all.

Quote:Each member within the community is expected to hold a skill-set vital to the success of the commune. While difficult, the climb can and has been made from the bottom of the social ranking toward the top and into a house of influence. 
I don't really think Keepers should veer into the area of family houses personally. I like the idea of small tribes better.


I hadn't seen that thread! I'll have to read into it, now! 

I think my goal with the quite different shift in cultural ways was to be just that, different. I mean they diverged for a reason, right? So while seekers are tribal and 'primitive' for lack of a better term since my brain is in sleepy time mode right now, Keepers have stepped beyond that towards a world of industry and trade (something I think, from examples of the U tribe in game, that some Seekers struggle with). 

With that would come a shift in value that's placed on physicality and battle prowess(seekers) and lean it in toward wealth and status. 

This of course is a generalization by any definition. Some Keepers may very well be more similar to Seekers still with the only difference being the shift in Nuhn/male roles. 

I thought there would be /should be some shift in the relationships as well. While the seekers tend to be polyamorous, I understand the Keepers to lean more toward to monogamy. The structure of the higher class's "courtship" seemed to fit with a matriarchy as well as still cling to some sort of tribal ancestry.  Freedom would be found in the majority of the population within the normal/lower castes. 

As to the house phrasing, I think I just worded it incorrectly. I didn't mean they had literal houses.. although it does fit with my structure, I suppose. There, though, I merely meant they would gain affluence. 

All very thought worthy points though, thank you!!


Quote:This topic has been poked at to death many times in the past, my favorite post on the subject can be found hereSadhttp://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/showthread.php?tid=2961). I'm not saying you have to accept it, but it does make reasonable conclusions regarding what a fantastical culture with these features would be like.
Thank you for this! I will be removing my post as I believe my largely under formed idea of the timeline is problematic. My ideas require far too much time to have passed to allow such evolution of the race's cultures.

At the end of the day, play what you play, right?

It always makes for an interesting story!


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - allgivenover - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 10:28 PM)ShayRei Wrote: Keepers have stepped beyond that towards a world of industry and trade (something I think, from examples of the U tribe in game, that some Seekers struggle with). ..

...With that would come a shift in value that's placed on physicality and battle prowess(seekers) and lean it in toward wealth and status... 

...I understand the Keepers to lean more toward to monogamy. The structure of the higher class's "courtship" seemed to fit with a matriarchy as well as still cling to some sort of tribal ancestry.  Freedom would be found in the majority of the population within the normal/lower castes... 

...As to the house phrasing, I think I just worded it incorrectly. I didn't mean they had literal houses.. although it does fit with my structure, I suppose. There, though, I merely meant they would gain affluence.

Some of this makes for some nteresting places that Keeper culture could go as a whole in light of the calamity, but it has absolutely no basis in lore whatsoever. I know it's frustrating that we don't details on such an atypical culture that many RPers are keen on being a part of, but that doesn't give us the right to just make it up and form a "player made compendium".


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Nimarhie - 10-15-2013

I think part of the trouble we might be having is that we are trying to stuff cat-people into a human cultural view. Among humans its considered bad for people to be promiscuous, at least in most cultures. Cats however do not share that view point. They go into heat and they go off and find a likely bed-buddy for a few minutes to half an hour.

Its more likely that both tribes are promiscuous, especially as Allgivenover noted, males are rare among the Moonkitties. They wouldn't pair up monogamously at all. I am sure there are exceptions, like in very tiny families where the head female lays claim to a particular male. Larger extended families would have a pool of males and the females would take one as the need or fancy arises. The males on the other hand would be trying to make themselves look better than the other males in the lot to get their genes passed on (just like in every other species - except maybe fish, dunno about them).

I kinda liked the OP's sociology write up, but I have to agree that it doesnt really fit. It might fit with the Sunkitties though.

As for or not making up stuff to fill in the gaps, that's a debate from another thread that was beat to death and got no where. Some people are alright with fannon, others think it's the road to hell lined with dubious good intentions. It's just a topic where both parties have to agree to disagree. Especially since the naysayers are not being forced to abide by said fannon.

ANYWAY... I'd be more inclined to pass on this idea that Moonkitties are puritan with their sexuality - and while I've said before that I haven't seen any moonkeeper prostitutes like I have Sunseekers, really its hard to tell one from the other sometimes.

That's my ten gil... *goes back to watching anime*

PS: We weren't given a "right" but SE hasn't come out and said that making up lore for our own enjoyment is against TOS. As long as someone isn't trying to make up stuff and for oithers to go along with it, it's not really your place to tell them they can't do it either.

*really goes back to watching anime this time*


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - TheBlob - 10-15-2013

(10-15-2013, 10:42 PM)allgivenover Wrote:
(10-15-2013, 10:28 PM)ShayRei Wrote: Keepers have stepped beyond that towards a world of industry and trade (something I think, from examples of the U tribe in game, that some Seekers struggle with). ..

...With that would come a shift in value that's placed on physicality and battle prowess(seekers) and lean it in toward wealth and status... 

...I understand the Keepers to lean more toward to monogamy. The structure of the higher class's "courtship" seemed to fit with a matriarchy as well as still cling to some sort of tribal ancestry.  Freedom would be found in the majority of the population within the normal/lower castes... 

...As to the house phrasing, I think I just worded it incorrectly. I didn't mean they had literal houses.. although it does fit with my structure, I suppose. There, though, I merely meant they would gain affluence.

Some of this makes for some nteresting places that Keeper culture could go as a whole in light of the calamity, but it has absolutely no basis in lore whatsoever. I know it's frustrating that we don't details on such an atypical culture that many RPers are keen on being a part of, but that doesn't give us the right to just make it up and form a "player made compendium".
Nope, you're very correct, and I did say that the sociological aspects were the made up bits.  Not saying mine is the basis that everyone would RP  with by -any- means... I just like to see where and how others have filled in their own bits to flesh out their idea of the culture.

As far as I'm concerned we can all continue to play as we will, we'll eventually find a group that RPs as we do and we'll all continue to /eye the ones we find strange. Hah
I just wanted to see how far fetched I was! A few decades it seems! Big Grin


RE: Anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Fates Skein - 10-15-2013

There's nothing wrong with throwing out some ideas about how Keepers might work!  I, personally, -love- to speculate and draw from RL influences (both human and feline/canine) in order to fill in the massive gaps of lore that exist in game for the miqo'te.  Of -course- it's just speculation and no one is saying that every Keeper/Seeker must adhere to these ideas, it's just a fun mental exercise that doesn't hurt anybody but may get people to thinking about things that they never considered for backstory.

ShayRei, rock on with this and I really don't think you need to strike it out!  Big Grin  Mentioned before or not, it's always good to read other people's takes on things.


RE: My take on the anthropology of the Keepers of the Moon - Jomoru - 10-16-2013

(10-15-2013, 10:16 PM)allgivenover Wrote: Keepers do not pair up monogamously. They have breeding males ala the Seekers of the Sun. Unfortunately we have no details beyond that.

From a level 25 Quarry Mill levequest that states explicitly that Keepers have breeding males as well (I forget the name at the moment)

[Image: aCBXBRR.png]





Or its a way of saying age. "3 young women and 1 adult male" just that Keepers consider sexual activity to be a part of adult quality. This does not mean they use the Seeker method and could easily hold more closely to monogomous relationships.


Secondly, this topic needs a disclaimer that a lot of this is your invention, isn't canon, and relies on a large number of assumptions. We don't get to decide the lore or the direction that Keepers should take, SE does. Unfortunately SE only gave us scraps and scarce details that begged even more questions. In the case of Keepers, all we ever got regarding sexuality and mating was the description that they are matriarchal and that males are rare. Few conclusions can be drawn from so little canon info, Keepers being monogamous isn't one of them.

Consider this, Miqo'te males are born very rarely (there is ONE that we get to see in game), if they paired monogamously with females there wouldn't be enough males to pair with, and as a result the Keepers would have passed into obscurity long ago.



I can think of 5 npc males found in game off the top of my head. If we compare the number seen in the U tribe(not Keepers I know) We see 3 Males but we also don't see a large group of females, in fact I don't think we even see ten there. So even among the Sun Seekers there is not as much of a huge gap and keepers are explicitly stated to only slightly favor more females.

(10-15-2013, 10:54 PM)Nimarhie Wrote: I think part of the trouble we might be having is that we are trying to stuff cat-people into a human cultural view. Among humans its considered bad for people to be promiscuous, at least in most cultures. Cats however do not share that view point. They go into heat and they go off and find a likely bed-buddy for a few minutes to half an hour.


Compare the sexual activities and mores of Bonobos(humanity's closest relatives) and humans. I don't think one can make an argument about the way animals work and the way a sapient race would end up.