Thread Closed
(02-06-2015, 04:23 PM)Warren Castille Wrote: ...the inferred tone in this thread seems to be aggressive towards an opposing viewpoint. Fuck, my post said you aren't wrong, which you seem to be okay with, but then you reiterate the whole debate over the other half of my point being that he's not wrong either. I'm not accusing anyone of anything.First bold: Isn't that the point of discussions? I mean, if everything was the same we wouldn't ever... have a discussion? One point of view is argued through, discussed, etc?
The "general opinions" in this thread are borderline hostile. Repeating them, moreso.
I'd only made 2 posts in the original thread this was split from.
First: Just don't talk about real life gender suggestion.
Why? Because you then get to make the judgment on the quality of the RP and not on the genitals behind a screen. If that's really what it is.
Second: Bringing up an event thread from a year ago that is an example of the type of negative feedback one might get with this type of mentality, that this type of RP may not be what some people here would encourage, want or participate in. Why? Because it's the same as mentioning casually to people that not everyone will really quite like a Mary Sue/Gary Stu in RP that wants to be the main character in everyone's RP.