• Login
  • Register
Hello There, Guest!

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost PW Lost Password?

Advanced Search
  • Rules
  • Staff
  • Wiki
  • Free Companies
  • Linkshells
  • Calendar
  • Chat
  • Gallery
  • Donate
home Hydaelyn Role-Players → Community → RP Discussion v
« Previous 1 … 18 19 20 21 22 … 108 Next »
→

So few Roe?


RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.

So few Roe?
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode

Warren Castillev
Warren Castille
Find all posts by this user
The Arbiter
******

Offline
Posts:5,367
Joined:May 2014
Character:Warren Castille
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 1,118 Timezone:UTC-5
RE: So few Roe? |
#8
10-02-2015, 09:02 AM
(10-02-2015, 08:59 AM)Bryn Wrote:
(10-02-2015, 08:37 AM)Warren Castille Wrote: Highlanders fulfill the "big person" archetype while looking "human." There's a number of Roe out there, but for the most part the traditional archetypes get fulfilled by other races: Miqo'te play the "beastial" traits up, highlanders do the Big Smash stuff, elezen play the graceful tones better...

I like Roes, and have one as an alt, but I think they're sort of redundant unless you're wanting specifically to be roegadyn. Everyone wants a snu-snu waifu but no one wants to play them.

See, I wouldn't agree with any of that. There's nothing 'bestial' about Miqo'te; they're small, slim humans with some cat features. After the Lalafell, they're the 'cutesy' race. Highlanders may be very built, but they're simply 'athletic' at a push; they're still within realistic human proportions, so they don't fill the 'Big Smash' type.

It all comes down to one simple factor; the cultural ideal of beauty. Roegadyns' exaggerated bodily proportions place them outside of this ideal moreso than the other races, with the exception of the Lalafell. And as we can see, Lalas are rather on the rarer side, too.

Most people want to play a character they find attractive, and role-players are no exception to this. While I personally find Roegadyn hot as all hells, I accept that their physique is a bit too 'out there' for most peoples' tastes.

Got me. I was thinking more in the "these look less-human." Think the difference between an orc and a human - still manlike but also not. Roe also fall into that category, but like you said, people might not be comfortable being that different and opt for something else. When 90% of the population is lithe catboi, Highlanders fulfill "big smash" just fine. They're tiny compared to big Roe, sure, but the comparison works fine regardless.

[Image: yEROfKO.png]
Wiki | The Grindstone
2018
17 | 16 | 15
Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Messages In This Thread
So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 08:32 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 08:37 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Bryn - 10-02-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 09:02 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ignacius - 10-02-2015, 09:26 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 08:55 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Bryn - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 09:07 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lekka Meyren - 10-02-2015, 08:57 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 10:06 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 08:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lekka Meyren - 10-02-2015, 09:00 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 09:03 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by SaintEaon - 10-02-2015, 12:49 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Judielle Farendaire - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ignacius - 10-02-2015, 09:05 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Sylentmana - 10-02-2015, 09:07 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Kage - 10-02-2015, 09:36 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Caspar - 10-02-2015, 10:28 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 10:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 10:54 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 11:01 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Hammersmith - 10-02-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 11:02 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 11:08 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 11:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by SaintEaon - 10-02-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Koureanna - 10-02-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Gegenji - 10-02-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 11:54 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 11:59 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Virella - 10-02-2015, 12:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 12:21 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Steel Wolf - 10-02-2015, 12:26 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 12:28 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Telluride - 10-02-2015, 12:57 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 01:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Edgar - 10-02-2015, 01:10 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cato - 10-02-2015, 01:52 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 02:00 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cato - 10-02-2015, 02:33 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Warren Castille - 10-02-2015, 02:57 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Eliane Dufresne - 10-02-2015, 03:12 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-02-2015, 03:31 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lydia Lightfoot - 10-02-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 02:08 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 02:12 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lydia Lightfoot - 10-02-2015, 04:22 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 07:55 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Edgar - 10-02-2015, 08:53 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Unnamed Mercenary - 10-02-2015, 09:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Kage - 10-02-2015, 09:19 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SicketySix - 10-02-2015, 02:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 03:42 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by myahele - 10-02-2015, 05:22 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Vyce - 10-02-2015, 05:42 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by SessionZero - 10-02-2015, 05:49 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-02-2015, 05:53 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by V'aleera - 10-02-2015, 08:01 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by -no longer matters- - 10-02-2015, 08:06 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-02-2015, 08:08 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by V'aleera - 10-03-2015, 12:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Garalona - 10-02-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Roe Dad - 10-02-2015, 08:47 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Mia Moui - 10-03-2015, 12:26 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-03-2015, 12:46 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Mia Moui - 10-03-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-03-2015, 06:48 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by LiadansWhisper - 10-03-2015, 12:53 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Shoshopu - 10-03-2015, 11:06 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Sounsyy - 10-03-2015, 11:36 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Knight Kat - 10-03-2015, 02:09 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Garalona - 10-03-2015, 02:43 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Lucius Ignatius - 10-03-2015, 04:27 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Ophexis - 10-03-2015, 06:37 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-04-2015, 09:28 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Cailean Lockwood - 10-04-2015, 09:41 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-06-2015, 07:59 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Fox - 10-06-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Alexandr Nocturne - 10-05-2015, 10:16 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by CrimsonMars - 10-08-2015, 02:04 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Nadine Marteau - 10-13-2015, 11:33 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by Valde - 10-13-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Austratus - 10-13-2015, 01:56 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by arkamas - 10-15-2015, 01:52 AM
RE: So few Roe? - by ɴᴘᴄ - 10-15-2015, 12:40 PM
RE: So few Roe? - by Klynzahr - 10-18-2015, 04:47 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)
Index | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | Current time: 07-01-2025, 07:22 PM


Final Fantasy XIV images/content © Square-Enix, forum content © RPC.
The RPC is not affiliated with Square-Enix or any of its subsidiaries.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.
Designed by Adrian/Reksio, modified by Kylin@RPC