If the issue is shortness of voting people it doesn't need to have the whole voting members. For instance, from the 20 people on the voting group the first 5 available will be selected. From those 5 a > 50% would be 3 +/5 to either side.
And I also agree with tsumi, sometimes things are just a dispute of momentary disagreement, is why is best letting them handle it in an ordered manner. The problem is when angry people tend to disorganize, hence the idea of the representatives to talk between themselves (from guild to guild not involving RPC)
By requiring them to have a logged talk before actually presenting the issue to the RPC it will gives them the chance to work it out before even being an RPC issue . . .
And I also agree with tsumi, sometimes things are just a dispute of momentary disagreement, is why is best letting them handle it in an ordered manner. The problem is when angry people tend to disorganize, hence the idea of the representatives to talk between themselves (from guild to guild not involving RPC)
By requiring them to have a logged talk before actually presenting the issue to the RPC it will gives them the chance to work it out before even being an RPC issue . . .
