(09-18-2013, 04:06 PM)Saikoray Wrote: The sexuality portrayed by the NPCs in question I think is more fan service than actual logic and lore.
We don't get to decide what's lore and what isn't. We learn about the game lore by what's presented in game and official lore posts, we don't get to cherry pick it because we don't like certain aspects.
Perhaps Sunseekers were written that way to cater to fan-service, but even if that were true that doesn't make that lore invalid. This doesn't mean you have to RP your Sunseeker as promiscuous, and in fact many might really like the idea of monogamy and reduced sexual availability as they would have exclusive access to a male.
If it bothers you so much that a good number of Seekers are canonically promiscuous or have no problem with monetizing their sexuality, consider that it doesn't reflect badly on YOU personally. You are not your character in real life and you are not a Miqo'te in real life, canon promiscuity presented by other Miqo'te doesn't reflect poorly on you out of character in the same way that my main Rakka'li acting like a selfish jerk doesn't actually reflect poorly on me out of character. If it still bothers you despite considering that, then consider re-rolling to Keeper, as I haven't found a single promiscuous Keeper female in game.
