• Login
  • Register
Hello There, Guest!

Username:

Password:

Remember me

Lost PW Lost Password?

Advanced Search
  • Rules
  • Staff
  • Wiki
  • Free Companies
  • Linkshells
  • Calendar
  • Chat
  • Gallery
  • Donate
home Hydaelyn Role-Players → Final Fantasy 14 → FFXIV News v
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 22 Next »
→

Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread


RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes

Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.

Balmung Transfer Restriction Megathread
Threaded Mode | Linear Mode
Pages (23): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 23 Next »
Jump to page 

Kagev
Kage
Find all posts by this user
Psy rockin' lala
*****

Away
Posts:6,067
Joined:Jan 2014
Character:Kage Kiryuu
Linkshell:Open RP
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 432 Timezone:UTC-8
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#106
05-17-2017, 01:54 PM
They most likely are talking about the afk auto-logouts when they talk about the character login restrictions.

Which is not at all unexpected.
Quote this message in a reply
Catov
Cato
Find all posts by this user
Garlean
*****

Offline
Posts:1,707
Joined:Aug 2013
Character:Cato Eligar
Server:Mateus
Reputation: 401 Timezone:UTC+1
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#107
05-17-2017, 01:58 PM
I have my doubts that the developers will change their stance on this. I'll be very surprised if they do. I also suspect that this is very much a necessity - for the sake of keeping Balmung stable. There's been a lot of problems over time, including a dubious economy, a lack of player housing and major issues whenever new content is added due to too many people rushing to get online at once. Aether has crashed more than once in recent months and that isn't entirely the fault of the development team.

Far too many people here and elsewhere have been constantly urging more people to transfer over to Balmung. I get it, a lot of people want their friends to be here too - and I've done as much myself. All the same, there's definitely valid concerns about the server being too bloated at this point.

Bigger isn't necessarily better. Technically there's 'more role-play' here than elsewhere. In large part that is due to Balmung serving as a vacuum which indirectly hampers attempts for other servers to truly thrive as legitimate alternative options. Let's be honest here, 99% of the time if someone has the choice between a huge server bustling with players and a smaller, much tighter knit server where more effort to find role-play is required they're going to go for the easiest option.

I expect the developers to continue offering incentives to players to transfer elsewhere and consider making use of other servers.
Quote this message in a reply
Lydia Lightfootv
Lydia Lightfoot
Find all posts by this user
Now with 60% less sodium!
****

Offline
Posts:718
Joined:Aug 2015
Character:Lydia Lightfoot
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 136 Timezone:UTC-7
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#108
05-17-2017, 01:59 PM
Yep, the post on the official forums is already getting anti-roleplayer pushback from people. Hooray.

Lydia Lightfoot ~ The Reliquarian's Guild «Relic» ~ Lavender Beds, Ward 12, #41

This player has a sense of humor. If the content of the post suggests otherwise, please err on the side of amusement and friendship, because that's almost certainly the intent. We're all on the same team: Team Roleplayer! Have a smile, have a chuckle, and have a slice of pie. Isn't pie great?
Quote this message in a reply
Literal-Ghostv
Literal-Ghost
Find all posts by this user
Visit this user's website
Pom Friend
**

Offline
Posts:23
Joined:Mar 2016
Character:Baeyl Teken'ghym
Linkshell:Excellent Roleplay
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 14 Timezone:UTC-4
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#109
05-17-2017, 02:10 PM
(05-17-2017, 12:21 PM)Ellmida Wrote: I sort of feel this was a long time coming, it's not unexpected. One of the reasons I moved 8 placeholder alts over to Balmung is because I suspected SE would probably be doing this at one point, it's surprising that the announcement was so sudden but I kind f think they were trying to avoid a lot of last minute rush transfers. While high population is good for RP i feel it's reached a critical mass where it's starting to hurt gameplay. Housing is not so much as a long shot as it is a lottery and while the new move may help with loading issues piling on more transfers to an overpopulated server could exhaust the capabilities of what it can support. The bonus is I don't have to witness a general f#$*ton of bots every time the server restarts.

I also think that the overemphasis on Balmung has caused smaller communities such as Faerie, Mates and Jenova to be passed over to  everyone's​ loss.

This is pretty much how I feel about it, too. The staff has been trying to nudge people into dispersing out into other servers for quite some time now, and it doesn't make much practical sense to make changes that accommodate the needs of overly populated servers while there are so many others that are near desolate by comparison.

Though it would be nice to be able to have the option to guest to other servers, and/or temporarily making transferring to lower pop servers free.

To be honest? I really hope that smaller servers see an increase in interest, especially for roleplayers. The general environment for Balmung has felt kind of unwelcoming for new players as of the past few months, especially if a new person's avatar starts out in Ul'Dah and their first litmus test to the server community is yet another shout chat discussion about futas. It can feel hard to get a foothold unless you already have friends you know in the game.

The people who are solidly sunk in Balmung are going to stay solidly sunk in Balmung, and the only real negative effect this change has on them is that a) they can't make new alts on Bal without fanting an old one, or b) if they have friends they want to introduce to the game, they have to make a new alt on another server with them. Both of those problems are probably largely inconsequential to most people who already have alts and already have a network of friends in game.
Quote this message in a reply
Aegirv
Aegir
Find all posts by this user
Visit this user's website
Probably a Pirate
****

Offline
Posts:482
Joined:Sep 2016
Character:Aegir Hlerson
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 82
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#110
05-17-2017, 02:13 PM
I didn't know Balmung's population is what's been causing the aether data center crashes.

[Image: tumblr_oddqgdbE4A1vfi4y5o1_1280.jpg]

http://aegir-ffxiv.tumblr.com/
Quote this message in a reply
Mipov
Mipo
Find all posts by this user
Junior Member
**

Offline
Posts:1
Joined:May 2017
Character:Miah Aliapoh
Server:Mateus
Reputation: 0 Timezone:UTC-6
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#111
05-17-2017, 02:18 PM
(05-17-2017, 01:33 PM)Sable Wrote: I actually have some alts on mateus that I HAD planned to move to balmung, I might actually keep them on Mateus and see what I can find.

Hello, someone from Mateus here! If you're planning on keeping your alt-characters on Mateus, there's actually a growing community of roleplayers. If you're around, feel free to message me (Miah Aliapoh is my main, but you can also find me on Leiah Tayuun). I've an FC I'm a part of, and we have roleplaying set as optional, and we've been been trying to get it back into full gear.

If people plan on moving to Mateus? That would be wonderful, and I look forward to  (trying) to meet everyone that decides to come over and give it a shot. There are plenty of people around that have the RP tag up, a lot of friendly folks, and people usually seem pretty happy to just ... play.

I'm really bad at this. I'm sorry.
Quote this message in a reply
Lydia Lightfootv
Lydia Lightfoot
Find all posts by this user
Now with 60% less sodium!
****

Offline
Posts:718
Joined:Aug 2015
Character:Lydia Lightfoot
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 136 Timezone:UTC-7
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#112
05-17-2017, 02:19 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2017, 02:21 PM by Lydia Lightfoot.)
I was just discussing with a friend, and one of the main issues is that even if they offered transfers off Balmung completely for free, and made incentives on low-pop servers with exp and the like, it wouldn't work very well due to "anchor" players: those who have spent resources on a gil sink that they wouldn't get back, such as a house or apartment, FC airships, or even just an FC chamber (300k gil is a lot of gil to lose for a lot of players). 

When we played ArcheAge and they had some server issues, one of the ways they tried to mitigate the anchoring issue was to offer a token item to anchor players which would let them reacquire a similar gil sink (not the exact same spot, but, for example, a medium house to a medium house) on their destination server. They'd made some new servers, and temporarily made it so that land could only be bought via those tokens (not by the normal currency), so that the anchor players who opted to "lead the way" with their transfer would have their pick of the choicest locations using their token. 

Even outside of RP, one anchor player who owns a house and refuses to leave and lose the gil they'd spent on it... well, if they're important to a big raid group, or a big PVP group, then their friends will be disinclined to leave them behind, and suddenly you have a big chunk of players who won't leave just because one or two among them have an anchor. Give them the option to pick up that anchor and drop it on the new server, and they might.

Lydia Lightfoot ~ The Reliquarian's Guild «Relic» ~ Lavender Beds, Ward 12, #41

This player has a sense of humor. If the content of the post suggests otherwise, please err on the side of amusement and friendship, because that's almost certainly the intent. We're all on the same team: Team Roleplayer! Have a smile, have a chuckle, and have a slice of pie. Isn't pie great?
Quote this message in a reply
Virellav
Virella
Find all posts by this user
Angry Ala Mhigan Grandma
*****

Offline
Posts:1,763
Joined:Feb 2015
Character:Too many?
Linkshell:MB-RP
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 461
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#113
05-17-2017, 02:31 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-17-2017, 02:32 PM by Virella.)
Got to love delusional people on the OF.

"Why not start another RP server." "You can just try to make one."

It has been tried and it failed before. But alas, don't let people hear about Gilgamesh.

I honestly wish it was realistic to start another RP server, and I support any attempt. But I'm cynical about the situation for a heap of reasons. I hope I'm proven wrong though!

☀Avelyn Firestone☀
Quote this message in a reply
Nigerian-Scam-Artistv
Nigerian-Scam-Artist
Find all posts by this user
Junior Member
**

Offline
Posts:1
Joined:May 2017
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 1
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#114
05-17-2017, 02:33 PM
Having a large role play community is a GOOD thing. 

What population issues are we actually concerned about? Housing? Apartments? If you consider that to be a problem, go to any housing ward and check the housing list. How many of those houses belong to single players? How many are being utilized on a regular basis? Now, if you are a person who thinks a single player should be allowed to have a house as well as enjoy a FC house and also a personal apartment, maybe that is a valid argument for you. But if you make an alt on any medium sized server, you're going to find the same situation. With the exception of the very low population servers: people have bought houses. Houses are an issue for them too.

The economy? If anything, Balmung has the most stable economy for middle income players. Yes, the big name crafters cannot gouge prices like other servers can. But there is also a huge variety of goods available and at a stable market price. 

Being on a small role play server is miserable. Finding like minded roleplayers is a shot in the dark. Everyone has their own preference. These preferences include tolerance to violence, language, sex, opinion on lore, sense of humor, schedule, posting length preference - and then you have to agree on what you want to role play. Some people want to do slice-of-life stories, some people want to do tavern/forest rps, some people want long, epic adventures. Some people just want sex. Some people want to RP politics in Ishgard, some people want to RP the tribal life of a Miqote. Some people want to rp the tribal life of an Au Ra. 

On Balmung, thanks to our HUGE buffet population, we can find these people. 

On smaller servers where you might have... 100-200 role players - all with different preferences, regards to lore, and availability ... you probably aren't going to find these people. 

This restriction might personally benefit YOU, because maybe it spurs YOU to transfer and meet new people on a smaller server but that should be your choice. Just like it should be MY choice if I choose to go to a small server where I might not jive with other role players, but I might be able to buy a house or an apartment. Or MY choice to go to the giant server, where on any given hour I can find someone to RP with. But I won't be able to get an apartment. Do not support taking away other people's choices to force your personal preference. 

I doubt this restriction will last long. Maybe a month or two after the release of Stormblood. They should have given us warning that they were going to do it, so those who wanted to get into Balmung had a chance to before they closed their gates for an indefinite period of time.
Quote this message in a reply
foxfirestormv
foxfirestorm
Find all posts by this user
Senior Member
****

Offline
Posts:286
Joined:Apr 2010
Server:Mateus
Reputation: 30 Timezone:UTC-7
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#115
05-17-2017, 02:44 PM
(05-17-2017, 02:31 PM)Virella Wrote: Got to love delusional people on the OF.

"Why not start another RP server." "You can just try to make one."

It has been tried and it failed before. But alas, don't let people hear about Gilgamesh.

I honestly wish it was realistic to start another RP server, and I support any attempt. But I'm cynical about the situation for a heap of reasons. I hope I'm proven wrong though!

Given Mateus has been going on for nearly-- 4-7 months now?? I think you already are. Wink
Quote this message in a reply
Nerov
Nero
Find all posts by this user
Carbide Warrior
********

Offline
Posts:910
Joined:Jul 2014
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 286
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#116
05-17-2017, 02:47 PM
Anyone who makes fun of my OF username gets banned. No exceptions.

Kidding, of course. For those interested, here is a relevant thread from two years ago that sort of addresses this topic.

In short: transferring is too expensive with not enough incentive. A mass exodus doesn't really need a coordinated effort, honestly.

The key to this is twofold: transferring needs to be completely free with no loss of any assets except for time, and there'd need to be some kind of official designation in order to facilitate the segregation of RPers and non-RPers.

That means transferring needs to be completely free at the minimum. Housing needs to be guaranteed. Things like FC airships need to be guaranteed, or adequately compensated in gil and materials.

At the same time, they should offer free transfers away from whatever the designated RP server is so that non-RPers can choose their environment.

I really don't see any downside to this, unless you're a corporate executive that only cares about quarterly profits and want to milk transfer money as much as possible. Which, I mean, it's Square Enix so...
Quote this message in a reply
savailv
savail
Find all posts by this user
Junior Member
**

Offline
Posts:28
Joined:Jan 2016
Character:Miynmekh Qestir
Server:Omega
Reputation: 0 Timezone:UTC-6
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#117
05-17-2017, 02:52 PM
(05-17-2017, 08:38 AM)Rash Wrote:
(05-17-2017, 07:20 AM)savail Wrote: My spouse has been playing with some friends on Phoenix.  Been contemplating transferring off Bal to join them (I made an alt over there, but I'm struggling getting both ready for Stormblood given I've been slacking with HW).  Apparently, there's a decent-sized linkshell for RP over there that he got an invite to.

Do you know what the name of the Linkshell is? I've been checking around on Phoenix and haven't seen anything really. Phoenix is a great server, busy but not to busy.

I know the people in charge have another LS listed here, but don't know if that one is active.  Looked it up on the Lodestone, and this is it:

http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/...695872350/

~ Miynmekh Qestir ~
Quote this message in a reply
Kagev
Kage
Find all posts by this user
Psy rockin' lala
*****

Away
Posts:6,067
Joined:Jan 2014
Character:Kage Kiryuu
Linkshell:Open RP
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 432 Timezone:UTC-8
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#118
05-17-2017, 02:54 PM
(05-17-2017, 01:59 PM)Lydia Lightfoot Wrote: Yep, the post on the official forums is already getting anti-roleplayer pushback from people. Hooray.
Unsurprising. The general populace on the official forums views Balmung's issues as a problem of Balmung's own making.
Quote this message in a reply
Virellav
Virella
Find all posts by this user
Angry Ala Mhigan Grandma
*****

Offline
Posts:1,763
Joined:Feb 2015
Character:Too many?
Linkshell:MB-RP
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 461
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#119
05-17-2017, 02:55 PM
(05-17-2017, 02:44 PM)foxfirestorm Wrote:
(05-17-2017, 02:31 PM)Virella Wrote: Got to love delusional people on the OF.

"Why not start another RP server." "You can just try to make one."

It has been tried and it failed before. But alas, don't let people hear about Gilgamesh.

I honestly wish it was realistic to start another RP server, and I support any attempt. But I'm cynical about the situation for a heap of reasons. I hope I'm proven wrong though!

Given Mateus has been going on for nearly-- 4-7 months now?? I think you already are. Wink
I'm curious how many people there are though. If you know the majority, I'd still say it's not... what people are looking for.

☀Avelyn Firestone☀
Quote this message in a reply
Kagev
Kage
Find all posts by this user
Psy rockin' lala
*****

Away
Posts:6,067
Joined:Jan 2014
Character:Kage Kiryuu
Linkshell:Open RP
Server:Balmung
Reputation: 432 Timezone:UTC-8
RE: High Pop Anti-Transfers |
#120
05-17-2017, 02:57 PM
(05-17-2017, 02:55 PM)Virella Wrote:
(05-17-2017, 02:44 PM)foxfirestorm Wrote:
(05-17-2017, 02:31 PM)Virella Wrote: Got to love delusional people on the OF.

"Why not start another RP server." "You can just try to make one."

It has been tried and it failed before. But alas, don't let people hear about Gilgamesh.

I honestly wish it was realistic to start another RP server, and I support any attempt. But I'm cynical about the situation for a heap of reasons. I hope I'm proven wrong though!

Given Mateus has been going on for nearly-- 4-7 months now?? I think you already are. Wink
I'm curious how many people there are though. If you know the majority, I'd still say it's not... what people are looking for.
How big is the 'web' so to speak? How large is the network?
Quote this message in a reply

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Pages (23): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 23 Next »
Jump to page 

  • View a Printable Version
  • Send this Thread to a Friend
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)
Index | Return to Top | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication | Current time: 05-21-2025, 07:19 PM


Final Fantasy XIV images/content © Square-Enix, forum content © RPC.
The RPC is not affiliated with Square-Enix or any of its subsidiaries.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group.
Designed by Adrian/Reksio, modified by Kylin@RPC