
Right, I guess I just misread it. I see what you both are saying. He didn't age physically, but since it is 1577 and he was born in 1548 he's still technically 29 on paper. That was my bad. Question retracted.
An experimental shift in character. |
|
RE: An experimental shift in character. |
05-20-2013, 01:44 PM
![]()
Right, I guess I just misread it. I see what you both are saying. He didn't age physically, but since it is 1577 and he was born in 1548 he's still technically 29 on paper. That was my bad. Question retracted.
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
|
|