Thread Closed
(07-18-2013, 02:00 AM)Spiritual Machine Wrote: I just think that having one person respond on behalf of Crystalline might make things neater and less cluttered, and more effectively convey the desired attitude. It's just a suggestion though--it's possible that that sort of misconception isn't happening at all in this thread.
I was just about to suggest this very thing, but SM beat me to it,
. It would just make organization much easier and give everyone commenting a single username to look out for for responses/explanations/discussions on how to whether a policy shift would help this or that/etc.Hehe, there's so much PR involved here! I'm admittedly taking notes in case I'm ever in a similar position.
My first exposure to Crystalline was noticing it in the user-sidebar beneath Aysun's name. When I looked at it in the Linkshell registry, I read the blurb about its IC purpose and also saw that it was closed membership. It wasn't really anything I thought of at the time, but it made Crystalline something curious to me. When I asked Aysun about it, I was surprised to learn that it... wasn't an IC linkshell to begin with and was only now gaining its IC purpose? (Is that correct?) In which case I thought that was pretty cool how an OOC friend linkshell was transforming into one with an IC goal and mission, since that transformation would also give to and enrich the community at large. About a day after I asked Aysun, this thread popped up and the timing was amusing,
.
![[Image: enucwJZ.png]](http://i.imgur.com/enucwJZ.png)