I got a 23 on that test, which is apparently middling dependent upon how I handle it.
It was a useful link, especially with the descriptions of why things could be considered bad, so thank youÂ
I may re-adjust one or two things though, understanding a bit better how bad they can seem (Or pointless), so she should improve.
I didn't run through it with my DnD character, but I think he'd score quite a bit lower, since he's not as good as he could be and fairly useless when it comes to a lot of things
Â
For my own thoughts, I do believe that some specialness is great, but without people who can play "normal" being special isn't at all. I've always understood the need to temper greatness with weakness.
It was a useful link, especially with the descriptions of why things could be considered bad, so thank youÂ
I may re-adjust one or two things though, understanding a bit better how bad they can seem (Or pointless), so she should improve.
I didn't run through it with my DnD character, but I think he'd score quite a bit lower, since he's not as good as he could be and fairly useless when it comes to a lot of things
 For my own thoughts, I do believe that some specialness is great, but without people who can play "normal" being special isn't at all. I've always understood the need to temper greatness with weakness.
Character: Raeletta Delqit on Gilgamesh.
