(06-27-2015, 03:53 PM)hauntmedoitagain Wrote:(06-27-2015, 03:38 PM)Allister Dedrick Wrote: 1. strawman
2. strawman. also, i roleplay an asexual character
3. what
4. strawman, but you do realize this kind of falls into the ERP category right
Is it really a strawman if you, the original poster, just won't admit that it's what you implied? It may not have been your intention, but that's very much how it came off.
Now if you must know why I tend to make my LGBT friendliness open (though I do not have it mentioned in my player search as there just isn't enough room), there are two reasons:
1. So people dealing with similar issues can feel safe knowing that I will neither judge them or their characters for sexual orientation or gender identity.
2. Because I get tired of having a number of male characters making not-so-vague attempts at straightening Vetiver or Foxglove's gay away when they will never, ever have a chance to begin with. It's a waste of my time and frankly demeaning, especially when I am actively seeking RP partners willing to provide companionship on a number of levels.
So yes, just because it's useless to you doesn't mean it isn't to me or someone else. Speak for yourself and not others, yes?
I'm sorry, but I want to make sure I'm reading this right...
Did he just call me a strawman for not agreeing with him?