Well I mean if things are acceptable from an RP from merely being mentioned in game.....then Fuck it, I am not a Highlander, I am a chocoogle. I mean hey, moogles exist in the world and so do chocobos, I mean the lore doesn't explicitly say they couldn't breed, so hey it must be okay to RP as one!
RPC has moved! These pages have been kept for historical purposes
Please be sure to visit https://ffxiv-roleplayers.com/ directly for the new page.
Plausibility of Vampire RP |
|
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:17 PM
(09-22-2015, 01:01 PM)Val Wrote: I don't really think we should take comical flavor text clearly meant to be a joke as a serious entry to lore, though. SE has a big history with throwing things in their games just to justify an action/event/whatever that doesn't need to be. The cephalopod seems to be more a joke name than anything else, an allusion to the real world myth rather than anything in game.Stated lore is canon lore, until otherwise contradicted. You don't have to like it, but you do have to acknowledge it. If we were to strike comical text out from canon the FFXIV universe would be a heck of a lot smaller. V'aleera's Wiki - https://wiki.ffxiv-roleplayers.com/pages...eera_Lhuil
V'aleera's Tumblr - valeeralhuil.tumblr.com |
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:20 PM
(09-22-2015, 12:57 PM)McBeefâ„¢ Wrote: Basically where we're at is that vampire legends clearly exist in the folklore, and they seem to be somewhat similar to european anime vampires.ÂI mean IClly it would be far easier to refer to a bloodsucker as a vampire. Even if they don't follow traditional vampire myth. Unless your character wants to sound like a pretentious douche and is like. "Technically." *Pushes rim of glasses up against nose* "He's not a vampire, but a bloodsucker who just happens to have a lot of traits that are consistent with vampirism." Wikis       Â
S'imba Tia S'imba Fate-14 Sheet                 K'ovu Tia Mateus character: Simb'a Sarabi |
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2015, 01:23 PM by Sounsyy.)
(09-22-2015, 01:01 PM)Val Wrote: I don't really think we should take comical flavor text clearly meant to be a joke as a serious entry to lore, though. SE has a big history with throwing things in their games just to justify an action/event/whatever that doesn't need to be. The cephalopod seems to be more a joke name than anything else, an allusion to the real world myth rather than anything in game. So... we can cherrypick the lore now based on whether or not we feel the mass culling of unfortunately named flying cephalopods is humorous or not? There's a metric tonze of lore that comes from item descriptions, fishing lore, and mount/minion text. I don't see anything about the Vampiric Tapestry's text that was "clearly meant to be a joke." What it shows is that Ishgardian people are as superstitious as the rest of Eorzeans and will drive a stake through a creature's heart just because of its name. Similar to how Ishgardians culled Au Ra because of their draconic appearance. If we are to discount these texts, we're also discounting the lore which gave us the name of Nanamo's father, the fact that Merlwyb Bloefhiswyn discovered the New World in 1556, and that during the War of the Magi, the Mhachi rode into battle on the backs of enchanted Manta Rays, which they called Magic Carpets. Do we discount those as well? "If it's humorous, it's not canon" also eliminates the lore bomb that Ul'dah zombified Sil'dih to end the War of the Sisters 400 years ago. And if Events aren't canon we lost a lot of lore about Paladins and the Thorne Dynasty. I mean... do I really need to go on? |
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:23 PM
If that's the case, we have Miqo'te dragoons because...?
|
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:24 PM
|
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:26 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2015, 01:26 PM by Warren Castille.)
|
|
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-22-2015, 01:31 PM by Melodia.)
(09-22-2015, 01:20 PM)Sounsyy Wrote:(09-22-2015, 01:01 PM)Val Wrote: I don't really think we should take comical flavor text clearly meant to be a joke as a serious entry to lore, though. SE has a big history with throwing things in their games just to justify an action/event/whatever that doesn't need to be. The cephalopod seems to be more a joke name than anything else, an allusion to the real world myth rather than anything in game. Sounsyy's point is valid and I agree. We can't just choose to ignore something because dislike the possible implications. I for one am not going to beg someone for lore and accept it with gratitude when it suits my purposes and then reject it next time because it doesn't. Thank you Sounsyy. Edit- Though I still think a vampire is pretty much unplayable. *nods* |
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:35 PM
(09-22-2015, 01:23 PM)Val Wrote: If that's the case, we have Miqo'te dragoons because...? (09-22-2015, 01:24 PM)Flashhelix Wrote:(09-22-2015, 01:20 PM)Sounsyy Wrote: So... we can cherrypick the lore now based on whether or not we feel the mass culling of unfortunately named flying cephalopods is humorous or not? Not sure what either of these posts has to do with anything, but knock yourself out Val. |
RE: Plausibility of Vampire RP |
09-22-2015, 01:37 PM
How do we know that any of the text relating to vampires is actually in-lore, however? There's been item text that, at first glance seems completely real, yet the devs themselves have come out and stated its non-canon nature. That is, Fantasia. So if Fantasia and the resulting flavor text isn't canon, what exactly is stopping somebody from asserting that a similar situation couldn't be happening with flavor text of another item?
roleplay?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
|
Users browsing this thread: 24 Guest(s)