Flashhelix Posted May 31, 2015 Share #51 Posted May 31, 2015 Honestly trying to argue that people shouldn't be pantsless because Coerthas is in a tundra is a bit dumb. Who wants to be that much of a nitpicker? Who -wants- to be that much of a nitpicker? Link to comment
Dat Oni Posted May 31, 2015 Share #52 Posted May 31, 2015 ...Does this count as clothed? Link to comment
Pastry Army Posted May 31, 2015 Share #53 Posted May 31, 2015 wyx6JDQCslE To sum up exactly why us Highlanders are constantly shirtless. 3 Link to comment
Kellach Woods Posted May 31, 2015 Share #54 Posted May 31, 2015 We can make a deal here... Put shirts on... but take pants off... that assumes kell wears pants Link to comment
Aoi Fukiku Posted May 31, 2015 Share #55 Posted May 31, 2015 We can make a deal here... Put shirts on... but take pants off... that assumes kell wears pants Male Au'ra and Male Highlanders have free roam to take off whatever they want in my presence. That is all. Link to comment
Blue Posted May 31, 2015 Share #56 Posted May 31, 2015 snip I think comparing Ul'dah to Ancient Egypt is a bit drastic. Most of clothing was exclusive to the wealthy (either because of taboos or because of prices). The poor wore nothing not because they could, but because they had to. They also did die at very early ages, for exposure to heat and also skin cancer (several types of cancers have been found descripted as early as in 2.500b.C. papyri). Sure, egyptians could wear like that today too if they wanted, but they would live a much shorter life, hence the evolution of clothing among beduins and other desertic populations since cultivation of cotton, flax and other materials became more common and less exclusive, as well as animal textures not being taboos anymore. I think Ul'dah is closest to the age of sultanates/modern era than to Ancient Egypt. But as for my overall stance on the OP's demand, see my first post. I'm not defending their request, just the logic of the topic. Link to comment
Altitis Acquired Posted May 31, 2015 Share #57 Posted May 31, 2015 We can make a deal here... Put shirts on... but take pants off... that assumes kell wears pants Male Au'ra and Male Highlanders have free roam to take off whatever they want in my presence. That is all. That doesn't include you then, Kell. ;P Link to comment
Seriphyn Posted May 31, 2015 Author Share #58 Posted May 31, 2015 The other day I was in the Quicksand and there was THREE shirtless male Highlanders. Obviously it is an EPIDEMIC! Link to comment
Pastry Army Posted May 31, 2015 Share #59 Posted May 31, 2015 The other day I was in the Quicksand and there was THREE shirtless male Highlanders. Obviously it is an EPIDEMIC! Epidemic? More like a good time! Link to comment
Altitis Acquired Posted May 31, 2015 Share #60 Posted May 31, 2015 The other day I was in the Quicksand and there was THREE shirtless male Highlanders. Obviously it is an EPIDEMIC! Epidemic? More like a good time! Amen! Praise the half-naked men! ;D Link to comment
Faye Posted May 31, 2015 Share #62 Posted May 31, 2015 snip I think comparing Ul'dah to Ancient Egypt is a bit drastic. Most of clothing was exclusive to the wealthy (either because of taboos or because of prices). The poor wore nothing not because they could, but because they had to. They also did die at very early ages, for exposure to heat and also skin cancer (several types of cancers have been found descripted as early as in 2.500b.C. papyri). Sure, egyptians could wear like that today too if they wanted, but they would live a much shorter life, hence the evolution of clothing among beduins and other desertic populations since cultivation of cotton, flax and other materials became more common and less exclusive, as well as animal textures not being taboos anymore. I think Ul'dah is closest to the age of sultanates/modern era than to Ancient Egypt. But as for my overall stance on the OP's demand, see my first post. I'm not defending their request, just the logic of the topic. I don't believe it's terribly off base; the game makes it a point to drive home the fact that a large portion of Ul'dah is incredibly impoverished. There's a reason it's the only city in the game the devs saw fit to include a seedy back alleyway full of homeless beggars (and NPC's warning you to watch your purse there). Regardless, the point wasn't necessarily to compare, I just got tired of seeing all the "No native would ever not be fully clothed in the desert, that's never happened before!!!" comments. Obviously it's going to make more sense to be more clothed in most circumstances, I just don't like inaccurate, blanket statements. Link to comment
Brynhilde Posted May 31, 2015 Share #63 Posted May 31, 2015 Look, I think it's painfully obvious what the problem is here. It's an issue of balance. The trouble isn't that there's too many men with their shirts off, it's that there's not enough ladies doing it, too. It's all out of kilter, see. Balance... Equilibrium, whatever. Basically, we have to get our tits out more. It's for the greater good. 3 Link to comment
K'nahli Posted May 31, 2015 Share #64 Posted May 31, 2015 I'm a manqo'te. So if I went shirtless it involks stereotypes. And if I put on clothes it'll probably involk some other stereotype. You can't really avoid it as a catboy, just gotta accept it. Though on a serious note, anyone ever get crap from not being tanned and living in the desert? People in the desert do wear heavy clothes to keep the sun from basiclly killing them. That's usually what I do. My main has rather pale skin but since I don't really RP that often - and practically never in public - she hasn't run into this yet but I am anxious that I will eventually! She's meant to be a Sagolii-based miqo'te after all. All of her family is more or less tanned too! sdfsdf On topic though, is the shawl okay? I guess technically it's not the most ideal thing for a desert but the game hardly offers a lot in terms of creating a unique-ish look. For hot climates, I am willing to overlook gears that don't look incredibly stuffy and even those that don't conceal very much, but I hate when people underdress in Coerthas OOCly!!11!1 Link to comment
Wymsical Posted May 31, 2015 Share #65 Posted May 31, 2015 Look, I think it's painfully obvious what the problem is here. It's an issue of balance. The trouble isn't that there's too many men with their shirts off, it's that there's not enough ladies doing it, too. It's all out of kilter, see. Balance... Equilibrium, whatever. Basically, we have to get our tits out more. It's for the greater good. But I thought people didn't like skimpy armor! ... or wait, is it different when there's just... nothing on? ... yeah, I'll advocate for this. Link to comment
Nako Vesh Posted May 31, 2015 Share #66 Posted May 31, 2015 Look, I think it's painfully obvious what the problem is here. It's an issue of balance. The trouble isn't that there's too many men with their shirts off, it's that there's not enough ladies doing it, too. It's all out of kilter, see. Balance... Equilibrium, whatever. Basically, we have to get our tits out more. It's for the greater good. Whaaat? I feel like everyone glamours the Taffeta set so the boobs are already out and running free! Link to comment
Chris Ganale Posted May 31, 2015 Share #67 Posted May 31, 2015 Look, I think it's painfully obvious what the problem is here. It's an issue of balance. The trouble isn't that there's too many men with their shirts off, it's that there's not enough ladies doing it, too. It's all out of kilter, see. Balance... Equilibrium, whatever. Basically, we have to get our tits out more. It's for the greater good. I support this movement. Link to comment
Pastry Army Posted May 31, 2015 Share #68 Posted May 31, 2015 Look, I think it's painfully obvious what the problem is here. It's an issue of balance. The trouble isn't that there's too many men with their shirts off, it's that there's not enough ladies doing it, too. It's all out of kilter, see. Balance... Equilibrium, whatever. Basically, we have to get our tits out more. It's for the greater good. I support this movement. Finally a valid excuse to back up my shirtless claim. Link to comment
Kellach Woods Posted May 31, 2015 Share #69 Posted May 31, 2015 We can make a deal here... Put shirts on... but take pants off... that assumes kell wears pants Male Au'ra and Male Highlanders have free roam to take off whatever they want in my presence. That is all. That doesn't include you then, Kell. ;P this assumes i do this for the well-being of whomever else but myself. Link to comment
Ryanti Posted May 31, 2015 Share #70 Posted May 31, 2015 My main has rather pale skin but since I don't really RP that often - and practically never in public - she hasn't run into this yet but I am anxious that I will eventually! She's meant to be a Sagolii-based miqo'te after all. All of her family is more or less tanned too! sdfsdf It's only the really nit-picky ones with a bit of a prickly attitude to boot that tell me things like that. But yeah, if you RP enough you'll probably get someone who will complain about it. Just remember that you can always choose to not RP with them if they don't like what you do. I find Ul'Dah to be a very prime example of a melting pot because of all the refugees and commerce that happens there. I don't see it as being homogeneous at all, even to desert natives. There are Ul'Dah NPC's everywhere with pale skin. As for your family, just make your main have a grandfather or grandmother that was pale. Sometimes genes skip a generation. There is usually a way to explain something if you want to RP it. When I was fleshing out Ryanti's family, I added in some Ishgardian influence before they closed their doors 20 years back to make another reason for why his skin is light and his hair is white. On topic though, is the shawl okay? I guess technically it's not the most ideal thing for a desert but the game hardly offers a lot in terms of creating a unique-ish look. For hot climates, I am willing to overlook gears that don't look incredibly stuffy and even those that don't conceal very much, but I hate when people underdress in Coerthas OOCly!!11!1 I don't see anything wrong with it IMO. Looks like something someone would wear in the desert if they wished. It's also pretty lined up with what I expect a Sagolii Miqo, as I imagine them to be more tolerable of standing the heat of the sun. The hood could be used to protect your face and your lower extremities can be protected too. Her abdomen might get red from the sun if she's out for a while, but that's about it. Link to comment
OttoVann Posted June 1, 2015 Share #71 Posted June 1, 2015 Yall get way too hung up in insignificant minutiae of RP. Shit I design fashion for a living and get mistaken for a flaming fashionista often, and still OOC I dont ever put this much thought into anything I wear or anyone else wear. It stifles your rp and makes you beyond boring and bland. Feel free to be upset with me now. Link to comment
Kellach Woods Posted June 1, 2015 Share #72 Posted June 1, 2015 so you're the guy to blame for how bland men's fashion is? Link to comment
Dravus Posted June 1, 2015 Share #73 Posted June 1, 2015 Different strokes for different folks. I don't like planning out every last little detail of my role-play based on a warped sense of 'realism' in a high fantasy setting but others do and I see no issue with it - especially since a lot of the role-players who visit this site end up frequenting completely different circles and likely won't interact much with each other anyway. Link to comment
K'nahli Posted June 1, 2015 Share #74 Posted June 1, 2015 I don't see anything wrong with it IMO. Looks like something someone would wear in the desert if they wished. It's also pretty lined up with what I expect a Sagolii Miqo, as I imagine them to be more tolerable of standing the heat of the sun. The hood could be used to protect your face and your lower extremities can be protected too. Her abdomen might get red from the sun if she's out for a while, but that's about it. You've offended his proud, tia heritage Link to comment
Ryanti Posted June 1, 2015 Share #75 Posted June 1, 2015 You've offended his proud, tia heritage But then you said she! And then Miqo'te! Oh well. His proud Tia heritage was the only casualty here. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now